1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    As the leftists do love them some peer reviewed versions of their reality, allow me to submit to the court of public opinion;

    Lara Logan, formerly of CBS, sounds off on media's treatment of Trump, other liberal bias

    Former CBS News journalist Lara Logan says the mainstream media is not allowing President Trump to be “normalized” as the nation's leader and accused CNN, among others, of passing off opinions as fact in a Fox News interview set to air Sunday.

    “I've never seen the press corps behave the way they do today," Logan told host Mark Levin on “Life, Liberty & Levin. "So, it stands out to me because it's a departure from what I've seen throughout the last three decades. There is something actually much more significant about what you're seeing happen with the White House press corps.”

    Last month, while appearing on a podcast hosted by former Navy SEAL Mike Ritland, Logan said that journalists were “mostly liberal” and pushing narratives. The comments that lead to a backlash against the former correspondent.

    Logan said she was “cheering” when former ABC News "Nightline" anchor Ted Koppel told an audience earlier this month that President Trump was not mistaken that the "establishment press" was out to get him.

    “I know I'm not the only journalist who's watching in horror as opinion and pejorative language is passed off as fact,” Logan said.

    The former “60 Minutes” reporter also criticized “CNN Tonight” host Don Lemon for not admitting he is an “opinion person” and called CNN’s chief media correspondent Brian Stelter “anti-Fox.”

    Logan added: “Why is [Trump] not allowed to change how the White House operates in terms of its communications and the rules of the White House press corps and how these things happen? He’s not allowed to be seen as an instrument of change. That's a propaganda talking point of the progressive political movement. He's not allowed to be normalized as a president. So whatever changes he makes have to be resisted by the Resistance.”
     
  2. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    Yes, a man who has a court after him over a charity he set up, the funding of his inauguration, and his taxes... Oh, and how about the new revelations of Deutsche bank...
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,430
    See?
    Mueller disapointed the despicables, what with his "no collusion" findings so now its onto what other shit they can stir up.

    Carry on, despicables, carry on.

    Trump has work to do.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
  5. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    Nice spin, illegal alien. I said nothing about being disappointed over Mueller's finding. Most of what I mentioned has nothing to do with Mueller's investigation, but regardless, they are still crimes.

    Are you saying that we should only punish criminals selectively based on whether they disagree with us politically?
     
  6. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,430
    You referenced Trump and other ALLEGED crimes.

    ALLEGED.

    Never has anyone heard reference about Clinton or DNC alleged crimes that should be objectively investigated from a despicable on this thread.
     
  7. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    Sounds to me like you're the one with the problem. Maybe you should ask for them to investigate Hillary. It can't be hard due to Trump's hatred for her. He did stamp and shout to "lock her up". I mean, she did lose the election, after all...

    Balls in your court.

    Sour grapes!
     
    • Like Like x 2
    1. View previous comments...
    2. shootersa
      Jesus
      Pigeon
      Chess
       
      shootersa, Mar 27, 2019
    3. submissively speaking
      That’s not me strutting; that’s me giggling, because I find it highly amusing to watch you try to negate the import of the meddling by insisting that your own government had done the same elsewhere.

      It was and is a BFD. Thank goodness some people realize that.
       
      anon_de_plume likes this.
  8. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,058
    Trump was never required to testify under oath. If Mueller was nearly as clever as Ken Starr it would have been easy for him to maneuver Trump into lying. The lie wold not have had to be about collusion with Russia. It could have been about the day of the week. Trump can't stop from lying.
     
    1. shootersa
      Well, guess that makes Trump smarter than Clinton, doesn't it?

      Trump knew better than to let Mueller get him under oath to ask those entrapment questions.

      Clinton didn't.
       
      shootersa, Mar 25, 2019
    2. anon_de_plume
      No, it just means that republicans have found they don't ever have to tell the truth because if called to testify they will just insist that they can only do it if not under oath.
       
      anon_de_plume, Mar 25, 2019
    3. shootersa
      Oh yes. Shooter sees your point.
      Just ask Mr. Flynn.
       
      shootersa, Mar 26, 2019
  9. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    Continue on with more investigations, we welcome them.

    I have strong doubts that the leftists were elected to investigate a POTUS from the opposite political party...but if that is what you leftists want to do, investigate vs. legislate....by all means I'm not stopping you leftists....the voters might stop you in '20.
     
    1. anon_de_plume
      I highly doubt anyone's vote will be influenced by investigations...
       
      anon_de_plume, Mar 25, 2019
    2. ace's n 8's
      Maybe...maybe not.
       
      ace's n 8's, Mar 25, 2019
  10. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    Still not accepting that there wasn't any Trump/Russia/Putin election collusion?
     
  11. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,430
    No, the old dog wants to see trump get what the old dogs man(woman) got. Tit for tat.

    Shooter is still trying to figure out who the adults are.
     
  12. Ed Itor

    Ed Itor dusted

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    16,207
    Democrats want Trump to win again that way they can continue to bitch & do nothing to improve the quality of life for the general population.
    This is the time for them to get down and get it done and make the Republicans really worry about next year.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,058
    I accept it, but I don't like it. :(

    I wanted the Mueller Investigation to expose some dirt about the orange monster, some very smelly dirt. I wanted proof of felonies.

    It will be interesting to see what this does to Trump's approval rating. I expect it to go up some percentage points.

    I feel sort of like Fundamentalists feel when someone they trust predicts a specific date for the Second Coming of Christ. The date comes and goes, and life goes on as before.:bored:
     
  14. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,430
    ! Time for a come to Jesus meeting with your congregation, Distant Lover?:p
     
  15. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    O
    Wasted time? There were many admissions of guilt and convictions. It isn't over for Trump, either. He still has the state of New York cases, and they've already acted on his charity by disbursing it's funds to other charity, and they still are facing criminal charges.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Ed Itor

    Ed Itor dusted

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    16,207
    This has just proven how effective the CIA is and what a good return Yankee taxpayers get on their $.
     
  17. passionsdevil

    passionsdevil Newcumer

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2013
    Messages:
    8
    Even if Russia intervened, they likely did it because the idea of a socialist American state is a problem. 1.If our economy collapses, there will be world wide consequences. 2.If we had the same economic philosophy- who would they spar with? 3.As much as we do so, it is a taste of our own medicine.
     
    1. Ed Itor
      You forgot 4. BECAUSE there's always a number 4.
       
      Ed Itor, Mar 26, 2019
  18. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    So all you guys are in favor of letting the full report get released to the public right?

    And while Mueller did not find collusion beyond reasonable doubt it doesn't really changing anything about the reason this thread was started. Which is yes the Russians did interfere in our elections and did it to help Trump. That has been proven beyond reasonable doubt.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,430
    So, whats your point again?

    Trump won because Russia interfered?
    Had nothing to do with Hillary?